Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device.
You can download and read online Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age: Historians and Computers file PDF Book only if you are registered here.
And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age: Historians and Computers book.
Happy reading Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age: Historians and Computers Bookeveryone.
Download file Free Book PDF Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age: Historians and Computers at Complete PDF Library.
This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats.
Here is The CompletePDF Book Library.
It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age: Historians and Computers Pocket Guide.
jetanlidelpo.ml - Buy Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age : Historians and Computers book online at best prices in India on jetanlidelpo.ml
Table of contents
- Internet Resources for Keeping Up with History (Bibliography, Research, and Teaching)
- Has the Historian’s craft gone digital? Some observations from France
- Historians and Digital History: Why Do Academics Shy Away from Digital History?
- 1st Edition
Some I will just link to. On web pages, unlike PDFs, it looks to me like Papers currently just saves the link. Being still new to Zotero, using it more also will help me become more of an expert. Thanks, Michael. Papers is very useful in that respect, and I like how the web pages are in tabs, a convenient workspace there. I seriously considered using Papers and may yet.
Internet Resources for Keeping Up with History (Bibliography, Research, and Teaching)
In fact, it is easy to copy the syllabus from Justia into the abstract which may work about as well. But my point here, the distinction I wanted to make, is that I think in Zotero, when you take a snapshot of a web page versus just the link , the text is indexed and therefore part of a search. This functionality, if I understand it correctly in Zotero, could be more important for me with old economics texts. It is more convenient for me to take a snapshot of the webpage.
But that is a lot more work than just adding an entire chapter from a webpage. On many of these old economic texts, they are freely available online, chapter by chapter. Using Zotero some has helped me better decide what to link, and what I want copied. Hi, Michael. One quick question: when you import files from Papers to Scrivener, do you import them directly or as aliases? One advantage of doing the former is you can import virtually everything, but you cannot keep these imported files in sync with those in Papers.
From the screenshot, it seems that this is what you do. If you make changes in those imported files such as making more annotations, what will you do to keep all of them in sync? You are right. I tend to periodically copy notes from Scrivener into Papers, which is not the most ideal way of doing it.
Has the Historian’s craft gone digital? Some observations from France
If I annotate a document heavily i. So I export it and then add it to the Papers entry. I think Scrivener at some point will have to update the way it handles files esp. Until then, one has to do it manually. Great post! I have a question about Papers.
Once you download the software, does it automatically index your hard drive for all available pdfs, or do you have to import them manually? Herbie, it does not. It will move them all into one place and rename them with a convention you decide, however. Another useful tool with functionality similar to Papers is Mendeley. It does a great job of organizing large libraries of PDFs and has the advantage of being free.
Great article. I think I might be one of the last grad students on earth who still has not switched to citation management software. Nevertheless, as a narrative historian, I need a way to get as close to everything I have taken notes on as I can. I am fully able to connect material and stories without classifying them in strict categories in advance. It seems to me that most historical data bases concentrate on pure data, i. I admit such data is useful, but it can severely corrupt our understanding of human history, which was traditionally a field based on stories.
In other words, Apple Works was a decidedly flexible format that allowed me to compose notes differently, depending on the categories I tentatively assign to them. The Czars at Apple, however, decided that this easy method was no longer needed. For the present, the majority of my files which number in the thousands, are stored in one very fragile old computer.
For the new files, I have simply put my new notes in paragraphs on a word processing file; these notes are composed somewhat like the notes I described above. This works, but I am not able to alphabetize the notes, a function I often find useful. The methods used in the above article are useful, but they allow for little creativity.
In addition, such data bases appear to take up too much time that could be used in writing. I sometimes feel compelled to tell my fellow historians that our connection to the social sciences is at best tenuous. Our profession is, in the end, based upon that most ancient way in which humans conveyed culture — through the art of story telling. Despite our advances into the age of technology, we should not forget that we are essentially story tellers.
In any case, I would very much like to know if any other historians feel the same as I do and if anyone is working on databases that allow for creativity. Both the essayists and the commentators on this page are to be commended for their efforts in a quest for assistance in our peculiar scholarly endeavors that range from such efforts as data analysis and simple stories.
To say the least, we are a bit quirky.
It seems to me that the databases we use should be as open-ended as we are. William, the limitations you are describing seem to only apply to Papers not Scrivener. What you are describing is exactly what Scrivener allows you to do. The first app, Papers, is for cataloguing PDFs and references. The second, Scrivener, allows you to compile and organize sources of all kinds any way you want. It also has extensive tagging and labeling.
Historians and Digital History: Why Do Academics Shy Away from Digital History?
Scrivener was created for novelists and screenwriters and it would certainly lend itself to narrative history even more than to the kind of history you see in the screenshots above. It has very clever associations that it builds between pieces of text. DevonThink Pro was one of the apps I used while formulating my workflow.
- items - The digital archive: challenges for historians - Mile End Institute.
- Watch Next.
- Johannes Brahms: A Biographical Sketch.
Of course, developing your own workflow is a subjective process and for some they might find using DevonThink instead of something like Papers makes more sense to them that is, if they then add another separate reference manager to their workflow. My apologies for my previous comment. I forgot which thread this was that I was looking at.
The links may still be useful though.
- Follow us on Twitter.
- Organic Chemistry 2 for Dummies.
- ISBN 13: 9780765601780!
- Representations of finite and compact groups.
- New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation.
- The origin of humans and early human societies;
This is really interesting, You are an overly professional blogger. Additionally, I have shared your web site in my social networks. My many liked style regarding artwork is practical and realistic and, lately, a surrealistic bent, for example, in my Allegorical paintings.
Research blogs on current projects have thus appeared, in large part thanks to the platforms Hypotheses. This new format has given rise to a new kind of writing both in form and in content 61 , but it also helps to break down disciplinary and hierarchical boundaries and establish new forms of scientific and pedagogical exchange They encourage methodological exchange and collective procedures.
Collective research projects in the social sciences raise a number of questions of institutional, relational and epistemological nature The digital tools that have appeared with the web 2. The generalisation of the use of email and international mailing lists 64 had already made international exchanges easier. With the tools now at our disposal — especially in collaborative bibliography 65 and collective writing — we can go even further.
Once again, we cannot include a full list of the possibilities here. Wikis 66 and collective blogs 67 , but also collaborative database construction 68 and social networking 69 open up new perspectives. Collaborative source transcription projects are a particularly good example They make source images accessible online and then count on volunteers to transcribe the documents and thus make them exploitable via keyword search or lexicometrical treatment. By signing up for an account on their website, volunteers could transcribe the journal and even conserve specific aspects of the manuscript such as marginal notes by encoding in XML-TEI Document 6 shows an example of one such transcription.
As the project progresses, the completed elements of the corpus are made available on the website. Document 6. Researchers and teachers need to recognise that there is a very real deficit in training for young and not-so-young colleagues as far as IT tools are concerned and this leads to a number of future risks.